District court’s conviction of defendant for assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 111(a) is affirmed as a rational factfinder could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer was acting within the scope of her official duties for the purposes of the statute.
Read US v. Troy, No. 08-2002
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine
Decided September 25, 2009
Judges
Before: Howard, Seyla, and Ripple, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Howard, Circuit Judge
Counsel
For Appellant: Richard L. Hartley, Law Office of Richard Hartley.
For Appellee: Renèe M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorney, Paul D. Silsby, United States Attorney
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
