District court’s imposition of a sentence based on calculation of the guideline range to include, as relevant conduct, amounts of drugs and cash independently seized from defendant in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation is affirmed as the defendant waived any objection to the sentencing determination, and the determination was not clearly erroneous.
Read US v. Eisom, No. 08-1893
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maine
Decided November 5, 2009
Judges
Before: Boudin, Seyla and Lipez, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Seyla, Circuit Judge
Counsel
For Appellant: Christine M. Charles
For Appellee: Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
