District court did not err or abuse its discretion in imposing the statutory mandatory minimum sentence, and defendant’s request that the statute be declared unconstitutional as applied to him is rejected, as he has not supplied any supporting argument and did not present a constitutionally based argument in the district court.
Read US v. Cirilo-Munoz, No. 08-1830
Appellate Information
Appeal from the United State District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Decided September 4, 2009
Judges
Before Torruella, Stahl, and Lipez, Circuit Judges. Per Curium Opinion.
Counsel
For Appellant: Rafael Anglada-López
For Appellee: Nelson Pérez-Sosa, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Julia M. Meconiates, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez, United States Attorney
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules