A Cambodian national’s petition for review of BIA’s order, mandating removal from the United States and denying her application for asylum and protection under CAT, is denied where the IJ’s findings that petitioner’s testimony was not credible based on fundamental discrepancies and inconsistency in her testimony are supported by reasonably, substantial and probative evidence on the record.
Read Seng v. Holder, No. 08-2485
Appellate Information
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided October 8, 2009
Judges
Before: Boudin, Seyla, and Dyk, Circuit Judges
Opinion by Seyla, Circuit Judge
Counsel
For Appellant: Joseph A. MacDonald
For Appellee: Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Thomas B. Fatouros, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Ann M. Welhaf, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
