Former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling is one of the most hated men in Houston. He’s not getting much love from the Supreme Court either.
Monday, the Supreme Court denied Skilling’s petition for review of judge’s “harmless” error in Skilling’s trial. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals previously rejected Skilling’s appeal, finding that the jury was presented with “overwhelming evidence that Skilling conspired to commit securities fraud,” The New York Times reports.
In the Supreme Court’s 2010 Skilling v. U.S. ruling, the majority held that the honest services statue applies only in cases involving bribery and kickbacks. Other applications are unconstitutionally vague.
After the Fifth Circuit upheld Skilling’s conviction a second time, the disgraced executive decided to try his luck once more with the Nine. Skilling’s attorneys appealed, claiming that the law does not allow the Fifth Circuit to determine whether the jury could have convicted Skilling without the discredited honest-services theory, and that the appellate court improperly ignored Skilling’s trial defense by rejecting a new trial, according to CNBC.
Skilling’s luck — much like Enron’s pension funds — has run out. The Supreme Court rejected his latest appeal without comment.
So what’s next for Jeffrey Skilling? Unless he finds additional grounds for appeal or a sympathetic state executive willing to issue a pardon, Skilling should resign himself to his 24-year fraud sentence.
Related Resources:
- Supreme Court Orders: Copyright Protection and Enron Rejection (FindLaw’s Supreme Court Blog)
- Skilling Gets 24 Years (CNN Money)
- Conviction for Honest Services Fraud Upheld Despite Skilling (FindLaw’s Seventh Circuit Blog)
- Employment Agreement - Enron Corp. and Jeffrey K. Skilling: Oct 13, 1997 (FindLaw)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
