In a capital habeas matter, denial of petitioner’s habeas petition is affirmed where: 1) given the overwhelming aggravating evidence, the state courts’ conclusion that no reasonable probability had been shown that, but for petitioner’s lawyer’s alleged lack of investigation, the trial court would have failed to sentence petitioner to death, was a reasonable application of clearly established federal law; 2) the trial court did not clearly err in determining that a juror was credible in testifying that she would apply the law fairly; and 3) a question that potentially injected a non-statutory aggravating factor into petitioner’s case was harmless.
Read Randolph v. McNeil, No. 08-12854
Appellate Information
Filed December 22, 2009
Judges
Per Curiam
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
