Pethtel v. Ballard, 09-6075, involved a defendant’s request for habeas relief from his convictions for sexual assault, filming a minor, burglary, and other various crimes, claiming that the ‘anti-shuttling’ provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA) was violated when he was transferred to West Virginia and then back to Ohio, before his West Virginia case was finished. In affirming the district court’s denial of defendant’s petition, the court held that a violation of the trial before return provision of the IADA is not cognizable on habeas review. The court further held that defendant has waived his due process claim.
Related Resource:
- Full text of Pethtel v. Ballard, 09-6075
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
