In Anderson v. Cytec Indus., Inc., No. 09-30333, an action challenging defendant’s denial of plaintiff’s ERISA claim for short-term disability benefits, the court affirmed judgment for defendant where 1) it was not unreasonable to ask for some objective showing that plaintiff’s PTSD-related disability prevented him from performing his job; and 2) defendant’s decision that plaintiff was not “totally disabled” was not arbitrary and capricious and was supported by substantial evidence.

Related Resources

  • Full Text of Anderson v. Cytec Indus., Inc., No. 09-30333
  • Full Text of In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litig., No. 09-30449

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules