Whether lawyers blog as a marketing tactic or for personal satisfaction, law blogging is pretty popular.
But blogging can cause problems for an attorney who doesn’t carefully adhere to his state’s professional conduct guidelines on his blog.
As Point of Law recently explained, Hunter’s blog was notable for the elements it included (client’s actual names) and the elements it lacked (attorney advertising and “results may vary” disclosures).
In February, the Virginia Supreme Court addressed whether Hunter’s blog posts qualify as commercial speech, and whether an attorney may discuss public information related to a client without the client’s consent. The court concluded that the Virginia State Bar can regulate blog posts as commercial speech, but that an attorney may discuss public information regarding a client on his blog. In support of the latter conclusion, the court wrote:
Before you start blogging about your legal practice, you should check with your state bar to see if there are any specific rules you need to follow. When it comes to compliance with professional responsibilities, it’s better to ask than to find yourself defending an honest mistake to state bar.
To the extent that the information is aired in a public forum, privacy considerations must yield to First Amendment protections. In that respect, a lawyer is no more prohibited than any other citizen from reporting what transpired in the courtroom.
Related Resources:
- Hunter v. VSB (FindLaw’s CaseLaw)
- Model Rule 7.2: Attorney Advertising (ABA)
- FTC Advertising Rules Your Firm Should Be Aware Of (FindLaw’s Strategist)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
