The trouble began when Pan Am Railway Co. together with its former president, David Fink, sued Atlantic Northeast Rails and Ports in U.S. District Court in 2011. In Fink’s complaint, he alleged that ANRP damaged his company by distributing defamatory articles via electronic and email newsletters.
Judge Nancy Torreson found in favor of the paper and concluded that Pan Am couldn’t prove that a defamation took place. In the opinion of the judge, Pan Am failed to prove any element of Defamation. She did, however, grant Pan Am a 30 day leave to amend its complaint. If Pan Am (Fink) chooses to do so, he has about half a month left to file.
Suits to Shut You Up
Corporate suits being used as a tactic to strong-arm weaker opponents is nothing new. But when the issue is speech related, courts and judges tend to scrutinize the facts that much more closely.
Still, this is America and the legal fees involved in defending such lawsuits can be onerous. It has often been said that while a motivation behind the American Rule is to encourage access to the courts, it also tends to encourage settlements and defeated acquiescence by weaker parties.
Related Resources:
- Settlement Reached in 3M Defamation Lawsuit (Public Participation Project)
- Is It Worth Suing for Defamation to Protect Your Reputation? (FindLaw’s Injured)
- Teacher Gets $363K for Students’ Lies, Defamation (FindLaw’s Injured)
- Do You Know How Slander, Libel and Defamation are Different? (FindLaw’s Injured)
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
